 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Daimler Chrysler Corp. v. Oakes, No. 138, 2000,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 11, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Estate of Gedling, Register of Wills Folio No. 110848,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 11, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In probate dispute, court rejected most of petitioner's exceptions to estate inventory and account, except for claimed omission of alleged credit in decedent's account at decedent's former residential care facility.
|
|||||
| McDuffy v. DeGeorge Alliance, Inc., No. 60, 1999,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 12, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court affirmed because the court's prior ruling resolved appellee's right to foreclose on its mortgages and appellants could not attempt to relitigate appellee's right to foreclose.
|
|||||
| State v. MacDonald, Cr. A. Nos. IN93-03-0550 & IN93-03-0551,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 12, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's guilty pleas were not coerced, because he pled guilty to offenses for which there were factual predicates in order to protect third parties (i.e., his wife and mother) who were being threatened with prosecution.
|
|||||
| State v. Saunders, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, April 12, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A U.S. Supreme Court opinion, issued during defendant's state litigation, would not alter how the court determined his case; therefore, his motion to reconsider was denied.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
