 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. v. Cantor, C.A. No. 16297,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 11, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Award of millions of dollars in attorneys' fees to limited partnership in action against disloyal partners was defensible, despite contractual provision, either as damages or under bad faith exception to American Rule.
|
|||||
| Hovis v. Hughes, Civil Action No. 99C-01-293 SCD,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 11, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's motion for new trial in plaintiff's suit concerning an auto accident was granted, because the trial court failed to determine if the risk of an improper inference from photos of the car outweighed their probative value.
|
|||||
| Middlebrook v. State, Nos. 424/427, 2000,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 11, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because of apparent conflicts which defendant had with the public defender's office, the trial court was required to allow defendant the opportunity to either find substitute counsel or make a pro se appearance.
|
|||||
| Brittingham v. State, No. 21, 2001,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 14, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant had no support for claim of illegal enhancement. Trial court was authorized to reimpose previously suspended prison terms consecutively after probation violation.
|
|||||
| Griffin Dewatering Corp. v. B. W. Knox Constr. Corp., CIVIL ACTION NO: 98L-09-008,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, May 14, 2001, Date of Decision
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff was entitled to recover from defendant contractor for equipment rented to building project under terms of payment bond; by executing the bond, contractor incurred the obligations to pay equipment providers described in the bond.
|
|||||
| In re Perez, No. 109, 2001,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 14, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Writ of mandamus could only be issued to a lower court or judge, not correctional facility. Defendant failed to show he followed procedure in lower court for review of sentence.
|
|||||
| Warren v. State, No. 181, 2000,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 14, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The 911 calls were admissible as hearsay exceptions, and did not violate Confrontation Clause. Improper comments by prosecutor were not plain error. Jury could have rejected defendant's reasons for his presence in apartment.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
