 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Evans v. State, No. 540, 2001,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 26, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's violation of probation hearing comported with the requirements of due process and his probation was properly revoked. Claim of ineffective assistance of counsel was unpreserved for review.
|
|||||
| Gloria Woodall, C.A. No. 01A-07-002 JTV,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, April 26, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Delaware Industrial Accident Board's failure to give adequate consideration to the factors for awarding attorney's fees was an abuse of discretion requiring remand. The conduct of claimant's counsel did not give rise to an estoppel claim.
|
|||||
| State v. Marks, ID No. 9612001794,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 26, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's postconviction claims were procedurally barred; defendant impliedly waived arraignment, did not show how consul notification would have helped, and did not show that counsel's representation was deficient.
|
|||||
| Waite v. Cont'l Nat'l Indem., C.A. No. 00C-12-005 WCC,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 26, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where injured party was injured when he was pulling a hose away from his oil truck while making delivery, he was not an occupant of the truck when he was injured. As a result, he was not entitled to personal injury protection insurance coverage.
|
|||||
| Am. Legacy Found. v. Lorillard Tobacco Co., C.A. No. 19406,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 29, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Tobacco manufacturer did not show foundation's decision to sue it was either inequitable or illegitimate, nor did it show factors imposing overwhelming hardship and inconvenience if forced to litigate in foundation's chosen forum.
|
|||||
| Arvey v. State, No. 634, 2001,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 29, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was not entitled to appointed counsel at his violation of probation hearing; he was given notice that counsel would not be appointed, he admitted that he violated probation, and reasons offered in mitigation of violation were simple.
|
|||||
| Flonnory v. State, No. 411, 2001,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 29, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although defendant complained about length of his sentence, reviewing court granted defense counsel's motion to withdraw, agreeing with defense counsel that defendant's appeal was wholly without merit and devoid of arguably appealable issues.
|
|||||
| Sanirab Corp. v. Sunroc Corp., C.A. No. OOC-02-191-SCD,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 29, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trade secrets act preserved a single tort action for trade secret misappropriation and eliminated all other tort actions founded on trade secret misappropriation. A conversion claim based on theft of proprietary information was displaced.
|
|||||
| State v. Wash., ID # 9603000529,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 29, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Postconviction relief was denied where defendant failed to substantiate ineffective assistance of counsel claim, failed to raise speedy trial violation at trial or on appeal, and where sufficiency of evidence claim was earlier decided on appeal.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
