 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Akala, I.D. No. 0112009759,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 13, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An outburst from a witness which did not directly relate to defendant's crime of falsely reporting an incident to police, and which was the subject of a curative instruction, did not require a mistrial because no prejudice to defendant was found.
|
|||||
| State v. McDowell, I.D. # 006018537,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 13, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's failure to comply with the requirements of the Uniform Agreement on Detainers was fatal to his motion to dismiss the indictment based on speedy trial grounds.
|
|||||
| Willing v. Midway Slots, C.A. No. 02A-07-001-RFS,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, May 13, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An employer's showing by substantial evidence that employee's total disability had terminated before her re-injury in a household accident did not preclude the employee from bringing a new claim for aggravation or recurrence of the old injury.
|
|||||
| Taylor v. State, Nos. 321 & 344,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 14, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Reargument of affirmance of death sentence was denied, as although the original opinion affirming the death sentence misconstrued the circumstances in cited case, distinction did not alter result, where mix of mitigating circumstances was different.
|
|||||
| Zebroski v. State, No. 482, 2001,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 14, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although open-ended questions might be preferable in death-penalty jury voir dire, they were not constitutionally required. Therefore, court could not reasonably find defense counsel ineffective for not requesting an open-ended voir dire examination.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
