 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bagwell v. State, No. 23, 2002,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 30, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant, who failed to provide transcript of sentencing proceeding, could not succeed in arguing on appeal that oral sentence and written sentencing order were inconsistent.
|
|||||
| Castetter v. Del. Dep't of Labor, C.A. No. 01C-03-007 HDR,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, April 30, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Claim of fraud was dismissed where worker alleged that false representations were made to him, but time, place, and contents of the false representations were not alleged, and the fraud count was not pleaded with the requisite particularity required.
|
|||||
| Chrysler Corp. v. Merrell & Garaguso, Inc., No. 38, 2001,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 30, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Liability insurance purchased by contractor for benefit of owner was enforceable, even for indemnification of owner's own negligence, as statutory insurance savings provision had no meaning if insurer could charge premium and then avoid coverage.
|
|||||
| Delmarva Power & Light Co. v. Abb Power T & D Co., C.A. No. 00C-02-175 WCC,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 30, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Limitation on liability provision in a contract between a sophisticated buyer and seller was valid, did not fail of its essential purpose, and precluded the buyer from recovering consequential damages due to the failure of the product it purchased.
|
|||||
| Gillenardo v. Connor Broad. Del. Co., C.A. No. 98C-06-015 WLW,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, April 30, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Competent evidence showed that the parties intended to agree to negotiate radio station sale in good faith as there was an express offer to negotiate in good faith to buy the stations, which the seller accepted when he executed the letter of intent.
|
|||||
| Hewlett v. Hewlett-Packard Co., C.A. No. 19513-NC,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 30, 2002, Date Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court decided that shareholders opposing merger of publicly traded global providers of computers and computer-related products and services failed to prove corporation misrepresented material integration facts or used coercion to obtain proxies.
|
|||||
| In re Revel, No. 166, 2002,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, April 30, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where inmate filed petition for writ of prohibition to correct his sentence, inmate was not permitted to invoke reviewing court's extraordinary writ process; he did not directly appeal his sentence or denial of his motion to correct.
|
|||||
| Milford Fertilizer Co. v. Hopkins, C.A. No. 00C-05-046 JTV,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, April 30, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Promissory note was under seal where preprinted language stated that debtor's hand and seal were set, and preprinted word "SEAL" appeared to right of debtor's signature. Therefore, note was governed by common law presumption of payment over 20 years.
|
|||||
| Muziol v. Daimlerchrysler Corp., C.A. No. 01A-07-002-JRJ,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 30, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an employee was harassed by co-workers after declining to participate in selling drugs, substantial evidence supported the decision granting the employee's worker's compensation petition for psychological injuries.
|
|||||
| Rogers v. Lear Corp., C.A. No. 01A-07-006-FSS,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, April 30, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where employee did not demonstrate how stress caused by employer, as opposed to other stress, was significant enough to affect her earning capacity or otherwise cause compensable damage, decision denying workers' compensation benefits was affirmed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
