 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Aeroglobal Capital Mgmt., L.L.C. v. First Islamic Inv. Bank, E.C., Civil Action No. 01C-11-127 (CHT),
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 25, 2004, Decided , May 25, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since a bank availed itself of the laws of Delaware, it was subject to its jurisdiction. However, as the company itself breached and anticipatorily repudiated the letter of intent, summary judgment was granted in favor of the bank.
|
|||||
| Cintra v. State, No. 496, 2003,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 25, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conviction of assault, deadly weapon possession, and reckless endangerment were proper, as recanting wife's prior voluntary statement about defendant's attacking and cutting her with machete was admissible; she was cross examined for truthfulness.
|
|||||
| Collins v. State, No. 505, 2003,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 25, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing the State to withdraw its plea offer, as defendant had not actually entered his guilty plea or relied upon the State's offer to his detriment.
|
|||||
| Mc Conaghie v. Wakefern Food Corp., C.A. No. 01C-05-230 MMJ,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 25, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Injured party did not show that a contractor who was sued for personal injuries received at a site where the contractor supervised construction had any contact with the site within six years before the action was filed.
|
|||||
| Reese v. State, No. 571, 2003,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 25, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: No sentence correction for defendant convicted of first degree assault (throwing acid in victim's face then helping him wash it out) was proper; sentence did not violate statute's limits or double jeopardy, and was not ambiguous or contradictory.
|
|||||
| State v. Fletcher, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, May 25, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence was sufficient for convictions of maintaining vehicle for keeping (or delivering) controlled substances and possession of deadly weapon during commission of that felony, even though defendants were acquitted of underlying felonies.
|
|||||
| Cal. Pub. Emples. Ret. Sys. v. Coulter, C.A.No. 19191-NC,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, KENT, May 26, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Delaware chancery court required discovery requests to be appropriately narrowed before it would grant them; it showed more liberality in granting motion to amend complaint despite proposed amendments' failure to add new claims.
|
|||||
| Fiori v. State, ID. No. 0308006360,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, May 26, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's DUI conviction was properly based on element that Intoxilyzer test was given within four hours after he drove--based on his admission he drank two hours before, warm car engine when officers arrived at accident, and testing time.
|
|||||
| Midcap v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., C.A. No. 01C-03-042 WLW,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, May 26, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A retailer was not entitled to a new trial nor remittitur as a result of a jury award to the survivors of a man killed in a house explosion as a result of a gas stove where the damage award did not shock the court's conscience.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
