 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Beebe v. Carroll, No. 281, 2003,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 27, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An inmate seeking a writ of mandamus requiring that he be granted parole did not demonstrate that he had a right to be paroled or that the board of parole violated its duty, so it was not an abuse of discretion to deny his petition.
|
|||||
| Jones Apparel Group v. Maxwell Shoe Co., C.A. No. 365-N,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 27, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A company's charter provision, which restricted the board's ability to set a record date for consent solicitations, was valid and enforceable even though it contravened the default provision of the Delaware General Corporation Laws.
|
|||||
| Motorola, Inc. v. Amkor Tech., Inc., No. 521, 2003,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 27, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Terms "license" and "assignment," as used in patent license agreement, were ambiguous, requiring trial court hearing a dispute involving the agreement to receive parol evidence, and precluding the entry of summary judgment as to the terms' meanings.
|
|||||
| Pesta v. Warren, C.A. No. 03C-04-294 SCD,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 27, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the landlords' pleading in a debt and summary possession action regarded an individual's status as a tenant, pursuant to judicial estoppel (rather than judicial admission), the landlords could not repudiate the assertion.
|
|||||
| State v. Morris, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, May 27, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate was not entitled to post-conviction relief on grounds that officer was permitted to give testimony regarding his observations and recordings of inmate's performance on field sobriety tests. Contrary to inmate's argument, this was not hearsay.
|
|||||
| Villabona v. Bd. of Med. Practice of Del., C.A. No. 03A-09-007 WLW,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, May 27, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a doctor and his patients would be harmed if he was not granted a stay of a court's judgment restricting his license during appeal, and the public would not suffer a substantial risk if the stay was granted, the motion for a stay was granted.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
