 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Perconti v. Thornton Oil Corp., C.A. No. 18630-NC,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 3, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because he was officer, court awarded former oil corporation officer indemnification for legal fees he incurred in successful defense of embezzlement action against him in oil futures trading scheme, but not legal fees to pursue fees.
|
|||||
| Cole v. State, No. 570, 2001,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 6, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was properly sentenced to minimum mandatory sentence for cocaine trafficking, which was three years, after defendant violated boot camp probation. Trial court was not permitted to impose less than minimum mandatory sentence.
|
|||||
| Crowhorn v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., C.A. No. 00C-06-010 WLW,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, May 6, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Revocation of an attorney's admission pro hac vice was not required to preserve the integrity or fairness of the judicial proceedings because his use of profanity and sarcasm, while not condoned, had not risen to the level required for revocation.
|
|||||
| Crowhorn v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., C.A. No. 00C-06-010,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, May 6, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When trial court struck insurance regulation allegations in insured's suit against insurer, insured did not timely appeal, allegations were unfair to non-party insurance commissioner, and due process was not denied. Interlocutory appeal was improper.
|
|||||
| In re Cook, No. 155, 2002,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 6, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant failed to appeal trial court's imposition of sentence following supervision revocation proceeding, he was not entitled to writ of mandamus as substitute for his failure to file timely appeal.
|
|||||
| In re Miller, No. 142, 2002,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 6, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Moore, No. 121, 2002,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 6, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate's petition for writ of mandamus in order to correct his sentence was denied. Reviewing court had already found that inmate had no right to correction of sentence. Trial court had performed its duty, crediting inmate with time served.
|
|||||
| May v. State, No. 34, 2002,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 6, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| True v. Diamond State Terminal, C.A. No. 01C-06-100 SCD,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 6, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where business's forklift operator was working at neighboring company's direction doing work to benefit only neighboring company at time of accident involving forklift, he was company's special employee, and business was not liable to injured party.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
