Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - Delaware - May 20, 2003

  
Allison v. State, No. 27, 2003, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 20, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where defendant failed to raise any argument in his opening brief concerning denial of his sentence modification motions and failed to properly perfect a postconviction appeal, the trial court's judgment was affirmed.

Search Cases for Free

  
Brathwaite v. State, No. 169, 2003, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 20, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where a defendant requested that he be allowed to proceed pro se on his appeal from a denial of his new trial motion following his convictions, the matter was remanded for an evidentiary hearing on that issue.

Search Cases for Free

  
Casale v. Chambers, C.A. No. 99C-04-325-JRJ (Consolidated), SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 20, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: First driver was negligent in a manner that proximately caused the collision and he was not entitled to any damages. Because he proceeded to make his left turn on a solid green light, he was required to yield the right of way to the second driver.

Search Cases for Free

  
Hacker v. Newell/Kirsch, C.A. No. 02A-06-005 HDR, SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 20, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Workers' compensation award based on a half-time work week was supported by substantial evidence where the worker's employment history and testimony indicated that due to family responsibilities, she normally worked part-time.

Search Cases for Free

  
O'Donnell v. Nixon Unif. Serv., C.A. No. 01C-10-291 RRC, SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 20, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Dismissal of previous action, with prejudice, following attorney nonfeasance in failure to respond to motion to dismiss, was judgment on merits, such that savings statute did not apply. Action, which was refiled, was barred by statute of limitations.

Search Cases for Free

  
Proctor v. State, Nos. 120/159, 2002 (Consolidated), SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 20, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: In light of defendant's failure to diligently prosecute the appeals by not filing an opening brief and appendix, dismissal of the action was appropriate.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top