 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Barnes v. Jackson, C.A. No. 1061-K,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, KENT, August 29, 2005, Decided , August 29, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court entered judgment, pursuant to Del. Code Ann. tit. 25, § 5108, in favor of the landlords in a tenant's action to compel the landlords to convey real property to the tenant under an option to purchase in a lease agreement as the tenant never exercised her option in a legally cognizable fashion before it expired with the lease's termination.
|
|||||
| Butler v. Newark Country Club, C.A. No. 02C-11-072-PLA,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, August 29, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Country club owed no duty to protect eight-year-old trespassing child from its golf course's iced-over water retention pond since the pond (1) was not an artificial condition under the attractive nuisance doctrine and (2) was an "open and obvious danger" that any child old enough to be allowed outside on his own was to recognize and guard against.
|
|||||
| State v. Bacon, IN 00-07-1666-1667R1, 1671-1673-R1; and IN 00-07-0347-0349-R1, 0351-0352-R1, 0356-0358-R1, 0358-R1 -- ID 0006017660,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, August 29, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a stipulation prevented the jury from learning about defendant's prior convictions, a motion to sever would have been denied, counsel had no reason to object to an in-court identification, and there was no videotape of defendant's statements that could be provided to the defense, defendant was not prejudiced by counsel's conduct.
|
|||||
| Downer v. Williams, C.A. No. 05M-08-004,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, August 30, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An inmate was not entitled to a writ of mandamus directing prison officials to release him on an earlier date than that which had been calculated because he misunderstood the difference in Level 4 and Level 5 time as set out in his sentencing order and he could request a modification of his sentencing order.
|
|||||
| Johnson v. State, No. 230, 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, August 30, 2005 Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
