Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Delaware - May 9, 2002
	Amstel Assocs., L.L. C. v. Brinsfield-Cavall Assocs., C.A. No. 18157-NC, COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 9, 2002, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Reformation of a sales agreement for the sale of six properties was ordered, where the purchaser showed a mutual mistake in the listed address of one of the properties, by clear and convincing evidence, as the listed address did not exist. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Davis v. Town of Georgetown, No. 444, 2001, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 9, 2002, Decided View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Richardson v. State, No. 610, 2001, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 9, 2002, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Supreme court affirmed judgment convicting defendant of violating probation for drug use and which imposed remaining two years (including time defendant had to wait for bed time at rehab program) of his original three-year sentence. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Williams v. State, No. 54, 2001, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 9, 2002, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Charging and sentencing defendant for separate drug possession charges after drugs were found in car and defendant's apartment, at same time, where defendant had one intended purpose of distribution, violated prohibition against double jeopardy. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Zdziech v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., No. 005, 2002, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 9, 2002, Decided View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us   Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.