 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bush v. Reyes, No. 67, 2001,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 25, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's appeal from the dismissal of her complaint was an impermissible interlocutory appeal, because it was an appeal from a determination of liability only, and damages had not been fixed.
|
|||||
| Gaither v. Simpson, Civil Action No. 15140,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 25, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Material issues of fact existed as to whether a caregiver was entitled to payment from the decedent's estate for services rendered to the decedent under oral contract or quantum meruit theories, precluding summary judgment.
|
|||||
| Shannonhouse v. State, No. 189, 2001,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 25, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Criminal appeal of imposition of sentence was dismissed where there was nothing in record reflecting that defendant's failure to file timely notice of appeal was attributable to court-related personnel.
|
|||||
| Silvious v. Conley, No. 355, 2000,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 25, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The reversal of an order dismissing an appeal because sellers failed to provide grounds for the appeal was proper because the purpose of a notice of appeal was to give the litigants an opportunity to act to protect their interests.
|
|||||
| State v. Cathcart, Cr.A. No. 9904001823,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 25, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's motion to exclude evidence of blood alcohol test results on ground that card detailing intoxilizer's internal calibration and test result had been lost was denied. There was no evidence the State acted negligently or in bad faith.
|
|||||
| State v. Phillips, SUPREME COURT NO. 132, 2001,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, May 25, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was allowed to proceed pro se where he was sincere in his desire to represent himself, desired to voluntarily discharge his attorney and proceed pro se, and was aware of the consequences of self-inflicted damage to his appeal.
|
|||||
| Unisys Corp. v. Royal Indem. Co., CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 99C-08-055-JOH,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 25, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Insured seeking coverage for its Y2K remediation expenses could not compel discovery of insurers' own remediation efforts; information was not sufficiently relevant to insurers' affirmative defenses.
|
|||||
| Mangrum v. Warren, C.A. No. 00C-07-012 SCD,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 29, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
