LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Delaware - May 10, 2002

  
Aquila, Inc. v. Quanta Servs., C.A. No. 19497, COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 10, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: In proxy contest, court denied 38 percent shareholder's request for temporary injunction to prevent newly formed employee trust from voting its shares in upcoming board vote, based on lack of threat of irreparable harm and balance of hardships.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Div. of Family Servs. v. Lxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, FILE NO.: 01-03-05TN, PETITION NO.: 01-07642, FAMILY COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 10, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: The court granted termination of parental rights in two-year-old daughter by default against father and for failure to follow a reasonable rehabilitation plan with appropriate goals against mother to give the daughter a more stable environment.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Greathouse v. State, No. 571, 2001, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 10, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Supreme court affirmed judgment that defendant violated probation by breaking cardinal rule of probationary program, not to engage in physical violence or threats of physical violence in any form, by kicking and hitting another inmate.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Irizarry v. Quinones, No. 197, 2002, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 10, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Lloyd, ID No. 0102010574, SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 10, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where a mistrial was declared because the State's witness inadvertently referred to defendant's greeting to an arresting officer after the court ruled that the greeting was inadmissible, retrial was not barred on double jeopardy grounds.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Slack, No. 601, 2001, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 10, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Vander Hoeven v. State, No. 533, 2001, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 10, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Since defendant's motion for modification of his sentence was both repetitive and untimely, and defendant showed no "extraordinary circumstances" for considering the late motion, superior court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Williams v. Unemployment Ins. Appeal Bd., C.A. No. 01A-10-012 CG, SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 10, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Delaware Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board's decision declining to accept jurisdiction over an unemployment benefits applicant's late appeal was affirmed because applicant waived his claims on appeal by failing to argue them in his opening brief.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.