 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cochran v. Kent Co. Dep't of Planning Servs., Civil Action No. 2179-K,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, May 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the owners of a 160-year old barn delayed unreasonably in filing for emergency relief, because there was no evidence in the record that suggested the barn had some historical significance, and because the barn posed an undisputed risk to public safety, the owners' emergency motion for a temporary restraining order was denied.
|
|||||
| Gatz v. Ponsoldt, Civil Action No. 174-N,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, May 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a sham recapitalization transaction did not cause any harm to the shareholders individually, it was a derivative action that had to be dismissed.
|
|||||
| Mullin v. W.L. Gore & Assocs., C.A. No. 05A-08-003 JRJ,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Industrial Accident Board erred in deciding the claimant's petition to determine additional compensation that her claim was barred by five-year limitations period in Del. Code Ann. tit. 19, § 2361(b), as Del. Code Ann. tit. 18, § 3914 required that notice be given of limitations defense and issue of whether notice had been given was not resolved.
|
|||||
| Taylor v. Jones, C.A. No. 1498-K,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, KENT, May 26, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court imposed a resulting trust in favor of a sister with regard to a half-acre parcel where the trial court determined it was the intent of the parents to convey the entire one-acre parcel to another daughter solely to help her obtain financing, with the intent that the sister would obtain the one-half after that purpose was served.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
