 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Fisher v. State, No. 633, 2001,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 13, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant was convicted of burglary and criminal mischief, and both defense counsel and the appellate court conscientiously examined the record and found no arguably appealable issues, State's motion to affirm the judgment was granted.
|
|||||
| Harris v. State, No. 238, 2002,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 13, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant failed to file timely notice of appeal, and there was nothing in the record to reflect that defendant's failure was attributable to court-related personnel, defendant's appeal was dismissed.
|
|||||
| In re Louis Bland, SBI # 215825, Def. ID # 9411016028 (R-2),
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, May 13, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re M&F Worldwide Corp. S'holders Litig., Consolidated Civil Action No. 18502,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 13, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Counsel representing a class of stockholders in a derivative action could advocate a proposed settlement objected to by some members of the class, and counsel's disqualification was not required.
|
|||||
| Turkey's Inc. v. Peterson, C.A. No. 01A-11-007-JRJ,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 13, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Claimant, who admittedly made sandwich while off duty and did not pay for it, resulting in discharge from employment, was not disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits, as the conduct was not shown to constitute willful or wanton behavior.
|
|||||
| In re Dodge, No. 190, 2002,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 14, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Richardson, C.A. No. 00M-10-007 JTV,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, May 14, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate's petition for writ of mandamus to compel correction department to return money to the inmate was dismissed; if the inmate had the money order in his cell, money order would have been contraband, which the inmate had no right to posses.
|
|||||
| Renn v. State, No. 230, 2002,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 14, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Weekends and holidays were excluded from the computation of time periods only when a period of time for appeal was less than seven days. Defendant's failure to timely appeal was not attributable to court-related personnel.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
