|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Delaware - September 12, 2005
|
| |
Bright v. Del. River Stevedores, Inc., C.A. No. 05A-01-010 MMJ,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, September 12, 2005, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where a claimant was hired on a day-to-day basis and became ineligible to work as a member of the casual workforce because she failed a physical, under Del. Code Ann. tit. 19, § 3323(a), substantial evidence supported the Chief Appeals Referee's conclusion that the claimant was a casual employee and not entitled to unemployment benefits.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
State v. Hardin, ID No. 02090008562,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, September 12, 2005, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Since defendant made no attempt to question the court's, or any other court's, authority to decide his case, he did not avoid the procedural bar under Del Super. Ct. R. Crim. P. 61(i)(4). Nor did he offer evidence to support his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Thus, defendant's claims for postconviction relief were procedurally barred.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
