 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Siegfried Group, LLP v. Piotrowski, Civil Action No. 2000-03-195,
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 31, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The business consultants' claim that the client breached an oral contract by not paying for services rendered failed, because the client's testimony that she paid for the services rendered in their entirety was unrebutted.
|
|||||
| State v. Karg, ID No. 9911000194,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 31, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court's determination that a trooper's initial stop was pretextual in a driving under the influence case was not supported by the record and the trial court's order that granted defendant's motion to suppress evidence was reversed.
|
|||||
| State v. Littleton, Criminal Action No. IN 99-11-0439 R1, 0440 R1,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 31, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's motion for postconviction relief was denied, because defendant's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel failed, as the record showed that the defendant was aware of the evidence against him in the State's possession.
|
|||||
| Van Arsdall v. Wilk, C.A. No. 99C-03-010,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, May 31, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where jury found both defendants negligent, but found that only one defendant's negligence was a proximate cause of car accident, it properly failed to apportion damages to defendant whose negligence was not a proximate cause of accident.
|
|||||
| Warburg, Pincus Ventures, L.P. v. Schrapper, No. 198, 2000,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 31, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a Delaware limited partnership merely claimed that it would be subjected to a hardship by having to defendant a suit in Delaware instead of in Germany where the action took place, without more, forum non conveniens was not appropriate.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
