 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Branpark, Inc. v. First USA Bank, C.A. No. 01C-01-230-FSS,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 2, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was denied to a commercial tenant claiming that its employees did not have written authority to sign certain leases, as the purpose behind the Statute of Frauds was to prevent an agent from making unfounded claims of authority.
|
|||||
| Riley v. Burris, C.A. No. 03C-05-014 HDR,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, June 2, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An inmate seeking to prohibit the corrections department from charging his inmate account for legal photocopying and medical services did not allege any actual or imminent interference with his access to the courts, so his complaint was dismissed.
|
|||||
| State v. Khan, ID # 0006014607,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 2, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant trying to withdraw guilty plea was not entitled to an evidentiary hearing, as colloquy indicated a knowing, voluntary, and intelligent plea; as defendant did not corroborate allegations of extreme duress and coercion, motion was denied.
|
|||||
| State v. Mayfield, I.D. No. 30209462DI and 9908025423, Cr. A. Nos. VN94-03-1312 and VN99-09-0642,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 2, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant did not file for postconviction relief within three years after his judgment of conviction became final, defendant had to prove a miscarriage of justice or a fundamental fairness exception in order to prevail, which he failed to do.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
