 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Kenyetta-Bey v. City of Wilmington, C.A. No. 99A-10-007-CHT,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 1, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment affirmed; claimant failed to establish that he had experienced any increase in permanent incapacitation of either his lower back or his left lower extremity since work-related injury was originally evaluated.
|
|||||
| Mountaire Farms, Inc. v. Pitts, Civil Action No. 98A-12-002,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, May 1, 2000, Date Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sufficient evidence supported the board's decision that an untoward event caused a new injury and appellant should have been responsible, and it was within the board's discretion to weigh the credibility of witnesses.
|
|||||
| Rypac Packaging Mach., Inc. v. Coakley, Civil Action No. 16069,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 1, 2000, Date Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Former officer was not liable for breach of duty or unfair competition where plaintiff had no expectancy interest in the contracts in question; on counterclaim, plaintiff owed no additional damages under the state wage act.
|
|||||
| State v. Roscoe, IK99-07-0201-0202,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, May 1, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Juvenile defendant's motion to transfer attempted murder charge to family court was denied, as defendant was found non-amenable to family court and closely related firearm charge was not transferable.
|
|||||
| Smith v. State, No. 462, 1999,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 2, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of motion to correct sentence proper; defendant failed to show actual prejudice from combining habitual offender and sentencing hearings, and habitual offender statute did not mandate that the hearings be on separate days.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
