LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Delaware - September 20, 2005

  
Bonham v. HBW Holdings, Inc., Civil Action No. 820-N, COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, September 20, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: At least one of the special circumstances justifying denial of a stay of discovery despite the pendency of a motion to dismiss existed as to each count of plaintiffs' complaint, albeit to varying degrees. The motion did not offer a reasonable expectation of avoiding further litigation over a number of disputes underlying the various counts.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Correa v. State, No. 563, 2004, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, September 20, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Cubbage v. State, No. 168, 2005, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, September 20, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's appeal lacked merit under Del. Sup. Ct. R. 25(a) because none of his claims met the cause and prejudice standard of Del. Super. Ct. R. Crim. P. 61(i)(3) or qualified for the exception in Rule 61(i)(5); defendant also failed to show that he was prejudiced by counsel's alleged ineffective assistance.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Flowers v. Daimler Chrysler Corp., C.A. No. 04A-12-003 MMJ, SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, September 20, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Because a hearing officer could reject expert medical opinions that were based in large part on an employee's input and the employee's credibility was irreparably damaged by the fact that she had three different versions of how her injuries came about, the Industrial Accident Board properly denied the employee's petition for workers' compensation.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Warwick Park Owners Ass'n v. Sahutsky, C.A. No. 418-S, COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, September 20, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Restrictive covenants' side lot setback requirements were enforceable and applied to residential owners' garage even though owners obtained county zoning variance. Association did not waive or abandon its right to pre-approve construction of buildings so owners were enjoined from further violations and had to remove foundation that was in side lot.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Woods v. Holden, No. 143, 2005, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, September 20, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Prisoner presented no evidence that charges against him were not facially valid or that trial court lacked jurisdiction to convict and sentence him for felony theft and other offenses. Prisoner's habeas corpus petition was dismissed under Del. Code Ann. tit. 10, § 6902(1) as he claimed only that parole board revoked his good time credits.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Wright v. State, No. 39, 2005, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, September 20, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.