 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cummings v. Jimmy's Grille, C.A. No. 99C-07-031-WTQ,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, August 9, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Reargument of the court's decision denying defendant's motion to vacate a default judgment was not permitted where it was clear that defendant had ignored the legal process until a financial judgment was entered.
|
|||||
| Green v. Alfred A. I. Dupont Inst. of the Nemours Found., No. 366, 1999,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, August 9, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment for defendants in medical malpractice trial was reversed and case remanded for new trial, as trial court's refusal to allow plaintiff to introduce videotaped deposition of defense expert prepared for trial was error.
|
|||||
| Liggett Group v. Affiliated FM Ins. Co., No. 447, C.A. No. 00C-01-207 HDR,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, August 9, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In suit in which tobacco company sought coverage from insurer for tobacco-related personal injury claims, court did not find that tobacco company's complaint was so vague that insurer did not need to file responsive pleading.
|
|||||
| Creative Builders v. Jackson, Civil Action No. 99-06-007 A,
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, August 10, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Oral modifications to a written contract were enforceable, even where the contract provided that such modifications had to be in writing, where a homeowner and contractor clearly agreed to changes that were subsequently performed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
