 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Corp. Serv. Co. v. Kroll Assocs., C.A. No. 99C-12-210-JRS,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 15, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since plaintiff's conduct indicated an acceptance of the terms of the contract as set out by defendant, there was an express as well as implied contract under the terms understood by defendant.
|
|||||
| Figueira v. Jevic Transp., Inc., C.A. No. 00C-05-010,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, June 15, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Insurance investigators' report was discoverable in case in which Mullins factors were applied to determination of whether materials were prepared in anticipation of litigation.
|
|||||
| In re Benson, No. 135, 2001,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 15, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Delaware attorney's flouting of tax laws and financial accounting and reporting rules warranted public, not private, reprimand and probation, even though clients had not been harmed.
|
|||||
| In re IBP S'Holders Litig. v. Tyson Foods, Consolidated Civil Action No. 18373,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 15, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The parties' merger agreement was a valid and enforceable contract that was not induced by any material misrepresentation or omission. Since cross-defendant stated a merger still made sense, an order of specific performance was the best remedy.
|
|||||
| Jackson v. Lobue, C.A. No. 00A-09-002-JEB,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 15, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court properly entered judgment in favor of an attorney in a client's legal malpractice action, because the client failed to show that the attorney's representation of the client in a workers' compensation matter was deficient.
|
|||||
| Midland Food Servs. v. Castle Hill Holdings V, No. 509, 1999,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 15, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ongard Sec., Inc. v. Goldyn, C.A. No. 00-02-0008AP,
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DELAWARE, KENT, June 15, 2001, Submitted , June 15, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Schuster v. Derocili, No. 337, 2000,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 15, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Existence of remedial scheme under Delaware employment discrimination legislation did not preclude employee from recovering for sexual harassment under theory of breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
|
|||||
| Wheatley v. Family Dollar Stores of Del., Inc., C.A. No. 99C-01-063 SCD,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 15, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where testimony supported injured's claim that boxes stacked on landing caused him to fall down flight of stairs, and expert testimony supported his injury claims, court denied motion for judgment as matter of law, new trial, or remittitur.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
