|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Delaware - May 24, 2002
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
St. Louis v. State, No. 323, 2001,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, May 24, 2002, Decided , May 24, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The jury instructions were clear, correct instructions on the elements of each offense and the overlap in the evidence used to establish both crimes neither offended defendant's constitutional rights nor confused the jury.
|
|
| |
|
| |
State v. Hammond, I.D. No. 90004877DI, Cr. A. No. IN90-05-1162R1, IN90-05-1163R1, IN90-05-1164R1,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, May 24, 2002, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendant's motion for postconviction relief was summarily dismissed because motion was not timely filed, he had not shown that the procedural time bar was inapplicable, and claim that the delay was due to ineffective assistance of counsel failed.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|