 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Blank v. Belzberg, C.A. No. 19567,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 18, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Objection to a proposed settlement of a stockholder class action was rejected where there was no evidence of a conflict or antagonism involving plaintiff, and plaintiff was exposed to the same economic terms and other conditions as all stockholders.
|
|||||
| Daprato v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., C.A. No. 02C-06-007 JTV,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, June 18, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under Delaware case law expressing public policy favoring coverage, a household exclusion in an umbrella liability policy was void and unenforceable in an automobile accident injury case.
|
|||||
| Goal Media Group, Inc. v. Teamtalk.com Group, PLC, C.A. No. 01C-11-023 WCC,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 18, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Issues of fact surrounded all three of defendants' "legal excuses" for nonperformance under a letter of intent to join in a venture with plaintiff; thus, summary judgment could not be granted to defendants in plaintiff's breach of contract action.
|
|||||
| Krasner v. Moffett, No. 569, 2002,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 18, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dismissal of stockholder action on pleadings was improper where question of the independence of the members of a special committee that recommended a merger turned upon the reality of the interests and incentives affecting the independent directors.
|
|||||
| Loper v. State, No. 608, 2002,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 18, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court complied with rules of criminal procedure when conducting hearing to determine if defendant violated probation, and state supreme court affirmed order sentencing defendant and held that defendant's counsel's motion to withdraw was moot.
|
|||||
| Skeen v. Wadsworth, C.A. No. 20110,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 18, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the disclosure claims were legally sufficient and there was reason to doubt the special committee members' ability to act independently, a motion to dismiss was denied.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
