 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Brown v. State, No. 248, 2004,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, July 2, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court dismissed defendant's appeal of trial court's denial of his motion for sentence correction where he did not file timely appeal notice and record did not support his claim that failure to timely file was attributable to court-related personnel.
|
|||||
| Fatovic v. Chrysler Corp., No. 602, 2003,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, July 2, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Fletcher v. State, No. 242, 2003,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, July 2, 2004 , Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court properly denied defendant's motion seeking access to the criminal history information of prospective jurors because statutory law prohibited defendant from acquiring such information in his second-degree murder criminal case.
|
|||||
| Weston v. State, No. 433, 2003,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, July 2, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since defendant shared a dwelling with his girlfriend and was there when drugs and many non-residents were found inside, the evidence was sufficient to convict him of various drug crimes, including maintaining a dwelling and endangering a child.
|
|||||
| In re Estate of Shank, C.M. No. 10962-NC,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, KENT, July 6, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court interpreted testator's will that sought to create bypass trust, and, after considering testimony from testator's attorney, daughter, and employee, determined that he intended cash bequests to his children to be made upon the death of his widow.
|
|||||
| Konkiel v. Wilmington Country Club, C. A. No. 03C-04-284 PLA,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, July 6, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Prevailing attorney in workers' compensation case was entitled to payment of attorney's fees in lump sum rather than bi-weekly basis as there was no statute, board rule, or case law that permitted employer's unilateral decision to pay over time.
|
|||||
| Turner v. State, No. 25, 2004,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, July 6, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Record did not support grounds for defendant's postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel, so counsel was not ineffective in not raising them, and no prejudice required to make claim first in postconviction proceeding was shown.
|
|||||
| Christiana Town Ctr. v. New Castle County, C.A. No: 03A-07-008 RSG,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, July 7, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: New Castle County, Delaware, Board of License, Inspection, and Review did not act arbitrarily in denying LLC's appeal, as the hearing transcript and the decision showed that the Board had intelligible bases for its conclusion.
|
|||||
| In re Tingle, Defendant ID No. 0205005760 (R-1),
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, July 7, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's postconviction petition was denied because: (1) his counsel was not ineffective, as he did raised the issue of whether an officer's search was proper; and (2) trial and highest courts' decisions on issue were res judicata.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
