 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Diversified Holdings, Inc. v. New Castle County Dep't of Land Use, Civil Action No. 00A-09-014 SCD,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 26, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Street was found to be collector street. It would lead to unreasonable result for subsequently developed parcel of land which required same access as earlier developed parcel to control usage of first parcel.
|
|||||
| Ellegood v. State, No. 104, 2001,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 26, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Supreme court affirmed conviction of misdemeanor theft and terroristic threatening. Dismissal of criminal charges at a preliminary hearing did not preclude the State from instituting a subsequent prosecution for the same offense.
|
|||||
| In re Ply Gem Indus., S'holders Litig., CONSOLIDATED C.A. No. 15779-NC,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 26, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the shareholders alleged that the CEO, accepting an offer to purchase the corporation, placed his gain above the shareholders' gain and that the other directors acquiesced in his conduct, a proper individual action was brought.
|
|||||
| Smith v. State, No. 32, 2001,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 26, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of defendant's motion for post-conviction relief was affirmed where the defendant was bound by the terms of the written plea agreement and his answers on the truth-in-sentencing guilty plea form.
|
|||||
| State v. Blank, Def. I.D.: 9712011730,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 26, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Delaware statute only prohibited changing lanes and crossing lane markings when driver failed to ascertain if it could be done safely. Traffic stop was not justified merely because defendant crossed lane markings for no apparent reason.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
