LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Delaware - October 11 - October 12, 2005

  
Bristow v. Del. Bd. of Examiners in Optometry, No. 128, 2005, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, October 11, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Durnan v. Cahall & Sons, Inc., C. A. No. 04C-03-018 THG, SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, October 11, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Princeton Ins. Co. v. Vergano, C.A. No. 266-N, 2004., COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, October 11, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Testimony sought by malpractice defendants from injured party's former counsel that injured party's post-settlement conduct was inconsistent with injured party's injury claims did not fall under crime-fraud exception to attorney-client privilege under Del. R. Evid. 502(d) where attorney concluded after fact that injured party had been untruthful.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Boulden v. Turner, C.A. No. 04C-10-031-CLS, SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, October 12, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Boulden v. Turner, C.A. No. 04C-10-031-CLS, SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, October 12, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: A court granted a police officer's motion to dismiss arrestee's cause of action against him because in arresting arrestee and reporting the allegations to the issuing magistrate, the officer was acting under the guise of Del. Code Ann. tit 10, § 4011(b)(3); he was therefore immune from suit. Also, Del. Code Ann. tit. 10, § 4011(b)(c) did not apply.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Costello v. Volkswagen of Am., C.A. No. 02C-04-165-JRJ, SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, October 12, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where a trial court failed to inform the jury of a property owner's duties when it was out of possession of premises that had been leased to another, a new trial was mandated in plaintiffs' slip and fall action, and the trial court requested submission of proposed jury instructions.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Holden v. State, C.A. No: 05A-05-004 RBY, SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, October 12, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Substantial evidence supported agency's decision to place a nurse on Del. Code Ann. tit. 11, § 8564 Adult Abuse Registry for four years for neglect of a nursing home "full-code" patient in respiratory arrest as provided in Del. Code Ann. tit. 16, § 1131(9)(a). The nurse failed to call "911" or to perform timely CPR under nursing standards.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Johnson v. State, No. 212, 2005, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, October 12, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Delaware's highest court lacked jurisdiction over appeal from superior court commissioner's probation revocation and sentencing decision because such decision was not a final order of that court; in fact, commissioner lacked authority under Del. Code Ann. tit. 10, § 512 to conduct such proceeding at all, making it a denial of due process.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.