 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Gatz v. Ponsoldt, Civil Action No. 174-N,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, October 13, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Transactions were many and complex so public shareholders, when repleading direct claims, were required to walk court through recapitalization's essential parts, fact-by-fact. Shareholders were to explain by what mechanism inflated liquidation value permitted preferred shareholders to receive more in recapitalization then they otherwise would have.
|
|||||
| Jacobson v. Ronsdorf, C.A. No. 518-N,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, October 13, 2005, Submitted , October 13, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Proctor v. Foraker, No. 429, 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, October 13, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Blackmore Ptnrs., L.P. v. Link Energy LLC, C.A. No. 454-N,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, October 14, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Insolvent LLC's directors facing pressing and worsening situation, LLC's bankruptcy, and fiduciary duties to creditors sold substantially all of LLC's assets to extract value for the LLC. Presumption that directors acted in good faith exercise of fiduciary duties to owners under business judgment rules was not rebutted even under enhanced scrutiny.
|
|||||
| Peden v. Gray, No. 188, 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, October 14, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because of an ambiguity in the closing date in an addendum to a real estate contract, the trial court properly considered parol evidence to determine the parties' intent; because the buyers were not ready, willing, and able to proceed by the agreed-upon extended settlement date, their motion for specific performance was properly denied.
|
|||||
| Upshur v. Justice of the Peace Court No. 17, C.A. No. 05A-04-001 THG,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, October 14, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a tenant failed to preserve the issue that she was not given the seven-day eviction notice required by Del. Code Ann. tit. 25, ¿ 5513 by raising it in either of the Justice of the Peace trials, the tenant was not entitled to certiorari relief.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
