 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| DuPont Hosp. for Children v. Pierce, C.A. No. 01A-01-008-CG,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 29, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Industrial accident board did not deny employer due process by using time limits at hearing and did not err by accepting psychologist's testimony as to cause of claimant's mental condition. Claimant proved recurrence of total disability.
|
|||||
| Great Lakes Chem. Corp. v. Pharmacia Corp., C.A. No. 18276,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 29, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Breach of contract claim was dismissed where complaint failed to allege that purchaser suffered cognizable injury resulting from breach. Predictions about future and statements of opinion did not give rise to actionable fraud.
|
|||||
| Hayes Trucking, Inc. v. Johns, C.A. No. 00A-06-007 SCD,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 29, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Industrial Accident Board's calculation of average weekly wage rate was legal issue that did not require evidentiary hearing and board's finding that employer and employee had entered valid agreement was supported by substantial evidence.
|
|||||
| Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Goerlitz, CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 99C-09-150-JOH,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 29, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because insurance policy for homeowners' insurance was considered severable as to each of the possible insured under the insurance contract, damage resulting from arson by one of the insured did not exclude the other family members from coverage.
|
|||||
| Norton v. Mulligan, C.A. No. 99C-03-102 RRC,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 29, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: New trial was denied in first driver's action after jury found that first driver was more negligent than second driver. Jury was properly instructed on first driver's duty under traffic statutes and lay witness's opinion was properly admitted.
|
|||||
| State v. Hawkins, Supreme Court No. 411, 2000,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, June 29, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The lower court found that if permitted by the supreme court, defendant should be allowed to proceed to appeal with legal representation; defendant's request to withdraw a request to proceed pro se was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent.
|
|||||
| State v. Marshall, ID Nos. 9907015850, 9907015833,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 29, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Delaware trial court's suppression of evidence and sua sponte dismissal of all charges against defendant without holding any hearing at all was an abuse of discretion.
|
|||||
| State v. Nelson, ID #: 9611000380,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 29, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's motion for postconviction relief was dismissed where the defendant failed to explain how his trial attorney's actions fell below an objective standard or how he was prejudiced by the alleged failures.
|
|||||
| Thomas v. Beaudet, C.A. No. 98C-09-084 SCD,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 29, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Award of costs to injured party was vacated where the court wrongly reimbursed him for a trial fee that the driver paid and where the court wrongly awarded him arbitration fees.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
