LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Delaware - June 7, 2002

  
Benjamin v. Appliance & Refrigeration Servs., C.A. No. 00C-07-006WLW, SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, June 7, 2002, Corrected Order Submitted , June 7, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: A biomechanical expert was unqualified to rebut a surgeon's testimony that a car accident was the medical cause of the alleged injuries; the biomechanical expert's testimony would only confuse and mislead a jury.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Hamm v. State, No. 16, 2002, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 7, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's burglary conviction was affirmed. There were no innocent explanations for the presence of defendant's fingerprints on the box in the victim's residence. The evidence led to the strong inference that defendant was the perpetrator.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Hickman v. State, No. 584, 2001, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 7, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Unequivocal waiver at trial of right to instruction limiting consideration of bad acts to issue of intent forfeited any claim for plain error review on appeal. Convictions of cocaine possession and trafficking in cocaine were double jeopardy.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Jones v. State, No. 293, 2000, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 7, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's first degree murder conviction was affirmed where the murder victim's statements regarding her then existing state of mind and intended future acts were properly admitted pursuant to the Delaware Rules of Evidence.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Moyer v. Moyer, No. 20, 2002, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 7, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Deangelo, ID # 9903023368, SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 7, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where one of defendant's convictions was vacated, double jeopardy did not bar modification of the remaining sentence on remand to produce a sentencing package of imprisonment and probation equivalent to that originally imposed.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Telxon Corp. v. Meyerson, No. 328, 2001, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 7, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Whether a director offered a corporation a corporate opportunity could not be resolved by summary judgment, nor could questions about the directors' independence and their compensation.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.