|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Delaware - June 29, 2006
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Godwin v. State, No. 4, 2006,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because a weapon was readily accessible, because defendant's prior juvenile adjudications were properly admitted under Del. Code Ann. tit. 10, ? 1063(b), and because collateral estoppel did not bar the prosecution, defendant was properly convicted of possession of a deadly weapon by person prohibited under Del. Code Ann. tit. 11, ? 1448(a)(4).
|
|
| |
Harbinger Capital Partners Master Fund I, Ltd. v. Granite Broad. Corp., C.A. No. 2205-N,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 29, 2006, Decided , June 29, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Trial court granted corporation's Del. Ch. Ct. R. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss where preferred shareholder sued to enjoin corporation's sale of certain assets; review of stock at issue showed stock could not give rise to a right to payment against the corporation, and, thus, the preferred shareholder lacked standing because it was not a "creditor."
|
|
| |
Palese v. Del. State Lottery Office, C.A. No. 1546-N,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 29, 2006, Decided , June 29, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Lottery ticket buyer's claims against the Director of the Delaware State Lottery Office and the Delaware State Lottery Office for a prize were dismissed for failure to state a claim as, pursuant to the Delaware State Lottery Regulations promulgated under Del. Code Ann. tit. 29, ? 4805(a), the winning ticket had to be presented to claim the prize.
|
|
| |
Smith v. State, Nos. 308, 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: During defendant's trial for, inter alia, attempted murder, a letter he allegedly wrote to a friend was properly authenticated under Del. R. Evid. 901(b)(2), (4) by the lay opinion of the friend, who knew defendant's handwriting from watching him write rap songs, and by the letter's distinctive content, including nicknames and details of the crime.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|