 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Furniture & More, Inc. v. Hollinger, C.A. No. 06A-10-004 JTV,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, July 31, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Award of liquidated damages under Del. Code Ann. tit. 19, § 2357 was improper because the demand for payment was made when the bill was initially presented to employer, the 30-day default began to run when a default in payment occurred, which was 31 days after receipt, and here, the bill was substantially paid off 21 days after default.
|
|||||
| Reybold Group v. PSC of Del., C.A. No. 06A-04-005-FSS Consolidated case,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, July 31, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Public service commission, under Public Utilities Act of 1974, Del. Code Ann. tit. 26, § 101 et seq., implemented revised water utility regulation representing reasoned and workable administrative approach to problems caused by expansion costs for new home building; thus, its order adopting regulation was affirmed even if approach was imperfect.
|
|||||
| State v. Lewis, ID No. 0101002067,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, July 31, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court denied defendant's postconviction relief motion; he did not show he received ineffective assistance of counsel in violation of Del. Const. art. I, § 7 and the Sixth Amendment, as his claim that counsel's shortcomings pressured him to plead guilty was refuted by the record, which proved that he was not pressured to enter guilty plea.
|
|||||
| State v. Scarborough, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, July 31, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court confirmed the imposition of habitual offender status on defendant pursuant to Del. Code Ann. tit. 11, § 4214(a) because the State was not foreclosed from any "option" to seek a declaration of habitual offender status where defendant had no basis for any reasonable misapprehension about the effect of his guilty plea.
|
|||||
| Thompson v. The Williams Cos., C.A. No. 2716-VCS,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, July 31, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Parent and subsidiary corporation were awarded judgment in a former employee's claim for an unconditional, unsecured advancement of his legal expenses because the advancement bylaw of the subsidiary corporation vested the subsidiary corporation's directors with the ability to place reasonable conditions on any credit advanced to the employee.
|
|||||
| Tiller v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., C.A. No. 05C-09-028-FSS,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, July 31, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court denied the claimants' motion for choice of law determination alleging that Delaware law applied to their action for underinsured motorist benefits involving a Delaware auto accident between Maryland residents; Maryland law applied since all relevant contacts were in Maryland and no Delaware public policy was implicated.
|
|||||
| Verizon Del., Inc. v. Laramore, C.A. No. 06C-11-243 WCC,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, July 31, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court granted the employee's motion to dismiss the company's complaint claiming it was entitled to reimbursement for workers' compensation benefits paid to the employee; company's complaint filed more than three years after it knew employee obtained settlement sum from a third party was time barred under Del. Code Ann. tit. 10, § 8106.
|
|||||
| Wilmington Parking Auth. v. New Castle County, C.A. No. 06C-02-158-FSS,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, July 31, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court denied city parking authority's claim asserting county had to pay city parking authority for its pro-rata payment to corporation as part of a property sale for taxes corporation had already paid for the full year; city parking authority did not pay tax and tax assessment was for entire year even if tax-exempt entity bought property.
|
|||||
| Feldman v. Cutaia, C.A. No. 1656-VCL,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, August 1, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Complaint against officers and directors of a corporation and partnerships which acquired the corporation was dismissed because the complaint did not adequately allege the presence of a controlling stockholder, and no equitable exception to the continuous stock ownership requirement of Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, § 327 and Del. Ch. Ct. R. 23.1 applied.
|
|||||
| Law Debenture Trust Co. v. Petrohawk Energy Corp., C.A. No. 2422-VCS,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, August 1, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Surviving corporation following a merger was awarded summary judgment in an action brought by an indenture trustee for the specific performance of the redemption of notes because no change of control occurred within the meaning of the indenture for the corporation which issued the notes and did not survive the merger with the surviving corporation.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
