 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Brown v. State, No. 227, 2008,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, August 11, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant's Del. Super. Ct. R. Crim. P. 61(a) (2008) postconviction motion and his appeal from the denial therefrom did not challenge his convictions for reckless endangering and maintaining a vehicle, the motion was properly denied.
|
|||||
| In re Buonamici, C.M. No. 04116-N-VCP,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, August 11, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A guardian breached her fiduciary duty, Del. Code Ann. tit. 12, § 3302(a), in making an unauthorized loan from the ward's estate to his mother. The guardian occupied the position of a fiduciary for each of the parties to the loan transaction, and should have sought court approval before making any loans.
|
|||||
| Mitchell v. State, C.A. No. 08C-05-052 JRJ,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, August 11, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the State did not carry any insurance to cover an elevator passenger's alleged loss, because it did not waive sovereign immunity pursuant to Del. Code Ann. tit. 18, § 6511, and because there was no applicable exception to sovereign immunity, the action against the State was barred by the immunity set forth in Del. Const. art. I, § 9.
|
|||||
| State v. Lewis, I.D. No. 0305016966,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, August 11, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's fourth postconviction relief motion was procedurally barred by Del. Super. Ct. R. Crim. P. 61(i)(4) because, inter alia, Supreme Court of Delaware had already found that defendant was unable to overcome time-bars, and any claim of a due process violation was not raised in his previous postconviction motions, nor in his appeal.
|
|||||
| State v. Stokes, I.D. # 76000001DI,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, August 11, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's motion for postconviction relief was procedurally barred under Del. Super. Ct. R. Crim. P. 61(i)(1) because it was filed twenty-nine years after his final conviction. The supreme court's revised interpretation of Del. Code Ann. tit. 11, § 636(a)(2) did not apply because defendant was convicted of first degree murder under § 636(a)(1).
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
