 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bradshaw v. State, No. 345, 2001,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 13, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's counsel had no authority to agree to Allen charge, in defendant's absence, where absence was not inconsistent with defendant's taking a long restroom break or getting food, and court's 15-minute wait was not long enough.
|
|||||
| Christiana Marine Serv. Corp. v. Texaco Fuel & Marine Mktg., C.A. No. 98C-02-217 WCC,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 13, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Laches defense by international oil provider was rejected, as there was no unreasonable delay and no prejudice in institution of action by barge contractor, where oil provider relied upon handshake and goodwill to perform important business function.
|
|||||
| Crawford v. State, No. 530, 2001,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 13, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant appealed after pleading guilty to sex crimes, and a review of record confirmed the opinion of defendant's counsel that there were no arguably appealable issues in the case, appellate court granted State's motion to affirm judgment.
|
|||||
| Harris v. State, No. 179, 1999,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 13, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As detaining officer did not articulate how defendant's lawful behavior matched police drug courier profile characteristics, officer's belief that defendant was drug courier was inchoate suspicion or hunch, and seized drugs had to be suppressed.
|
|||||
| Murphy v. Thomas, No. 377, 2000,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 13, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court did not abuse its discretion in setting the amount of a remittitur of a judgment for plaintiffs, and in setting the amount of an additur of the judgment for plaintiffs following a retrial, based on the evidence presented.
|
|||||
| Ross v. State, No. 491, 2001,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 13, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: It was not plain error to sentence defendant to 10 years at Level V after defendant's fourth violation of probation.
|
|||||
| State v. Anderson, ID # 30306671DI,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 13, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Delaware Protection from Abuse Act did not apply to defendant, who was convicted of unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor.
|
|||||
| State v. Brock, ID # 9611002565,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 13, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's "cookie-cutter" motion was utterly without merit since it did not specifically address the facts of the case; defendant could not claim an interest in the Protection from Abuse Act when he was the abuser.
|
|||||
| State v. Grayson, ID # 30500267DI,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 13, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Movant's motion for postconviction relief was barred by three-year statute of limitations, where he was convicted in 1985, and he filed motion in 2002. Movant failed to show that fundamental fairness exception to statute of limitations applied.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
