 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Brandt v. Rokeby Realty Co., C.A. No. 97C-10-132-RFS,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, July 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When an office tenant claimed that his health had been injured by mold growth in the office ceiling tiles, testimony by the tenant's experts was admissible, as the landlord's problems with it could be cured by cross-examination, presentation of contrary evidence, and instruction. Issues of fact existed as to punitive damages and hypersensitivity.
|
|||||
| Buchanan v. Buchanan, C.A. No. 06C-06-041 ESB,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, July 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the superior court lacked jurisdiction over a husband's complaint seeking damages for an impairment of contract, fraud, misrepresentation, interference with land use, bad faith, and partition, but jurisdiction lied within the Family Court, said complaint was dismissed.
|
|||||
| In re Atamian, No. 125, 2006,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, July 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff was not entitled to a writ of mandamus or of prohibition requesting review of a superior court order that denied his motion for an evidentiary hearing and a letter sent by the superior court to the parties as to the posture of the litigation as he had an adequate remedy at law - he could appeal the superior court's final decision.
|
|||||
| Wilson v. Wilson, 04C-03-031 WLW,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, July 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a suit over personal property and the payment to defendant by a company that held a mortgage on plaintiff's mobile home, both parties' motions for summary judgment, filed pursuant to Del. Super. Ct. R. Civ. P. 56(c), were denied because there were clear issues of material fact that could only be resolved by a jury.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
