|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Delaware - July 29, 2004
|
| |
Brooks-McCollum v. Emerald Ridge Serv. Corp., Civil Action No. 147-N,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, July 29, 2004, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Court denied a corporate director's motion to compel indemnification, more accurately classified as a request for advancement, because she was not defending a suit, she was plaintiff, and she had not delivered an undertaking to repay any advancement.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Hollinger Inc. v. Hollinger Int'l, Inc., C.A. No. 543-N,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, July 29, 2004, Decided , July 29, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Shareholders did not have a statutory right to vote on corporation's sale of group of publications; under two-pronged "all or substantially all" test, unsold publication components, quantitatively, left corporation viable, substantial, and ongoing.
|
|
| |
Hollinger, Inc. v. Hollinger Int'l, Inc., No. 331, 2004,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, July 29, 2004, Submitted , July 29, 2004, Decided
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Morra v. Unemployment Ins. Appeal Bd., C.A. No. 03A-11-004 RFS,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, July 29, 2004, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where a claimant failed to file a timely appeal to the Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board, as required by Del. Code Ann. tit. 19, § 3318(c), and failed to present any evidence of a Department of Labor error or severe circumstance that would grant the Board jurisdiction sua sponte, her appeal was properly dismissed as untimely.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
