 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| D & G v. Horton, C.A. 00A-10-007-FSS,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, July 17, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since parties' valid agreement did not consider title to cars important, recycler could not use statutory violation as defense to non-performance.
|
|||||
| Dudlek v. Jackson, C.A.No. 00C-09-128-JOH,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, July 17, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Mention of possible second suit in order that dismissed first suit for failure to comply with service requirements was not intended as a ruling concerning whether second suit could be filed. Motion for reargument/clarification was denied.
|
|||||
| Indus. Rentals, Inc. v. New Castle County Bd. of Adjustment, No. 233, 2000,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, July 17, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: If deed restriction had been satisfied then it no longer was deed restriction. Phrase "projects containing deed restrictions requiring phasing" in New Castle County, Delaware, development code meant presently existing deed restrictions.
|
|||||
| State v. Bloomingdale, ID # 9906013775,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, July 17, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In criminal appeal, case was remanded to reconsider post-trial motions where trial court lost jurisdiction after defendant noticed his appeal to appellate court. Trial court's post trial decision vacating DUI conviction was out of order.
|
|||||
| State v. Norcross, I.D. No. 0002006278,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, July 17, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since a jury verdict could be impeached only by evidence of extrinsic influences and it could not be impeached by evidence of intrinsic influences, defendant's motion for a new trial was denied.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
