LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Delaware - October 31, 2005

  
Grosvenor v. State, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, October 31, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Hamby v. State, No. 222, 2005, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, October 31, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant was properly denied postconviction relief, as claims that his guilty plea was coerced due to the ineffective assistance of his counsel lacked merit, he was properly sentenced per his original plea agreement, and his prior felony convictions and probation violations supported a harsher sentence than his co-defendant.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Howard v. State, No. 328, 2005, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, October 31, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Del. Super. Ct. R. Crim. P. 35(b) provided that the trial court would not consider repetitive motions for reduction or modification of sentence. Because defendant had filed five previous motions to modify his sentence, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's most recent motion.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Interim Healthcare, Inc. v. Spherion Corp., No. 279, 2005, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, October 31, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Lurie v. Mont., C.A. No. 01C-11-150 MMJ, SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, October 31, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where the injured party was awarded $ 450,000 for her car accident injuries, remittitur to the amount of $ 100,000 was appropriate. The injured party had not sought medical treatment in four years with the exception of one examination. There was no claim for future medical expenses or lost wages. Past medical expenses were $ 13,000.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Roache v. Larkin, No. 459, 2005, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, October 31, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Shintom Co. v. Audiovox Corp., No. 214, 2005, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, October 31, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, ¿ 151(c) did not mandate that all preferred stock confer a right to payment of dividends. Preferred stock was required to have some bona fide preference over other stock. A liquidation preference of preferred stock, without more, was sufficient to create a preferred stock, and the stock was lawfully issued.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Tyson Foods v. Hudson, C.A. No. 05A-05-002 RFS, SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, October 31, 2005, Submitted
View this case - free  

Overview: Where employer appealed Delaware Industrial Accident Board's determination that employee worked for employer, that was not appealable case decision under Del. Code Ann. tit. 29, ¿ 10102(3). There had not been final adjudication on merits of claim since Board had not ruled on petition to determine additional compensation due against employer.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Wharton v. Chancellor Health Care, C.A. No. 04A-09-004 (JTV), SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, October 31, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Because substantial evidence supported the Industrial Accident Board's conclusions that an employee was not credible and failed to prove that pain management treatment was a reasonable and necessary medical treatment for her work accident, the Board properly denied the employee's petition to determine additional workers' compensation due.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.