 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| C. A. S. v. K. P., File No. CN96-07133, Petition No. 98-26814,
FAMILY COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 2, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court found no reason to limit father's visitation to daytime visitation, and found that joint custody and standard visitation was in children's best interests. Court found no reason to reopen the record.
|
|||||
| Congo v. Gibson, No. 49, 2000,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 2, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Kowal v. Clark, C.A. No. 18001,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 2, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Would-be buyers of land were not entitled to specific performance of contract for sale; buyers did not obtain mortgage by deadline, and seller later indicated intent to cancel contract, though different reason for cancellation was given.
|
|||||
| M. H. v. K. B., File No. CN99-07545, 00-15889,
FAMILY COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 2, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In light of husband's contribution of premarital assets to purchase of home, wife's dissipation of assets, and disparity in earning power, husband was awarded 75 percent of marital estate, and 25 percent of debt.
|
|||||
| Von Opel v. Youbet.Com, Inc., C.A. No. 17200,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 2, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in his stockholder suit against defendant for its failure to file agreed-upon registration statements with the SEC was denied, as he had raised disputed issue of material fact.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
