 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| BAE Sys. N. Am. Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp., C.A. No. 20456,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, August 3, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where one defense contractor bought another contractor's division, paid a judgment entered against the division, and then sued for reimbursement, partial judgment on the pleadings as to disputed interpretation of parties' sale agreement was denied.
|
|||||
| Dieterich v. Harrer, C.A. No. 024-N,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, August 3, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Stockholder's count against former directors of acquired corporation alleging lack of entire fairness in connection with acquisition was not dismissed; it was not derivative but stated direct claim on behalf of class who cashed out shares in merger.
|
|||||
| Evans v. State, No. 323, 2003,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, August 3, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Statements made one, three, and 10 days after shooting were properly excluded because time that elapsed since shooting negated requirement "excited utterance" be made while declarant was under stress of excitement caused by event or condition.
|
|||||
| In re Nat'l Auto Credit, Inc. - S'holders Litig., C.A. No. 19028-NC; Consolidated,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, KENT, August 3, 2004, Decided , August 3, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendants' motion to dismiss a derivative action in Delaware because of a settlement reached in a New York proceeding was denied because New York order was not final where settlement would not go into effect until dismissal of the Delaware action.
|
|||||
| Ward v. Hennessy, No. 585, 2003,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, August 3, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err by dismissing prisoner's mandamus suit to require department of correction (DOC) to remove records of his discipline for having computer disks; DOC did not have duty to expunge and prisoner had lawsuit pending.
|
|||||
| Ward v. State, No. 48, 2004,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, August 3, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court did not err in denying habeas corpus relief to defendant because such relief was not available in the absence of any evidence that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to charge him with and try him for robbery and assault.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
