 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. v. Cantor, C.A. No. 16297-NC,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 21, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendants' motion for reargument, amendment to, or alteration of judgment and/or for clarification of a judgment in favor of a partnership was denied; focusing on legal expenses and costs of litigation was the proper basis for relief.
|
|||||
| Council of the Dorset Condo. Apts. v. Gordon, No. 238, 2001,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 21, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Fulk v. Wash. Serv. Assocs., C.A. No. 17747-NC,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 21, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where shareholders in a two-person corporation lacked an exit strategy and could not agree on a buy-out price, a Delaware court could prescribe a sale with injunctive conditions to protect a seller's right to a fair price.
|
|||||
| Henry v. State, No. 596, 2001,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 21, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's claim in his appeal of trial court's denial of his motion for modification of sentence was not presented to trial court, nor did he present evidence original sentence was illegal or inappropriate.
|
|||||
| McBride v. Allstate Ins. Co., C.A. No. 01C-04-027,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, June 21, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Family exclusion clauses, if clear and unambiguous, properly excluded coverage for indirect actions by third parties against an insured stemming from an insured person's bodily injury claim. Summary judgment was granted for the insurance company.
|
|||||
| Patton v. State, No. 649, 2001,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 21, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Reagan v. Randell, C.A. No. 19338-NC,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, June 21, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where minority shareholder forged a document that was sole ground of his defense against majority shareholder's cause of action against him, this constituted such egregious conduct as to support award of attorney's fees to majority shareholder.
|
|||||
| Reed v. Brady, Civil Action No. 2156-S,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, June 21, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In sheriff's suit against attorney general, as he sought to vindicate legal, not equitable rights, chancery court lacked jurisdiction to grant declaratory relief; that he included prayer for injunctive relief did not make claims equitable.
|
|||||
| Reed v. State, No. 641, 2001,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, June 21, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although it was improper for a Delaware trial court to seat jurors from a venire of which the person who prosecuted defendant had been a member, defendant failed to show egregious circumstances indicating actual bias.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
