 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Mell v. New Castle County, C.A. No. 03M-06-030 (JRS),
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, August 4, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Mandamus relief was available to enforce settlement agreement that provided for release of government information, except for grand jury information, the release of which would have violated the law.
|
|||||
| Mitchell v. Haldar, C.A. No. 03C-03-100-PLA,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, August 4, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conscience of the court was not shocked by jury award to the patient of less than his claimed medical expenses; evidence of relationship between physician's conduct and certain injuries was relatively weak, and patient's expert was not very credible.
|
|||||
| Patterson v. Super Dog Pet Food Co., C.A. No. 03A-04-009 JRS,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, August 4, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The lower court properly made a well-supported factual determination that the owner of a dog training school was responsible for payment of an invoice to the dog pet food company where there was no documentation regarding the sale of the school.
|
|||||
| Sides v. Wiercinski, C.A. No. 04C-05-043 MMJ,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, August 4, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: After review of the affidavit of merit and accompanying curriculum vitae of plaintiff's expert witness in a healthcare negligence claim, the court found the affidavit of merit complied with Del. Code Ann. tit. 18, § 6853(a)(1) and (c). It was signed by the expert witness, who was licensed to practice medicine as of the date of the affidavit.
|
|||||
| State v. Carter, I.D. No. 0309011756,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, August 4, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's various drug possession and related convictions were upheld on appeal where the State proved more than defendant's presence in a room because defendant was in the bedroom alone, marijuana smoke was emanating therefrom, and his identification card and personal papers were found in the room as well.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
