 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Hyson, No. 435, 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, November 8, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because an inmate did not demonstrate a clear right to a writ of habeas corpus, that no other remedy was available, or that a superior court arbitrarily failed or refused to issue the writ, the inmate's mandamus petition under Del. Const. art. IV, § 11(6), Del. Sup. Ct. Ct. R. 43 did not invoke the state supreme court's original jurisdiction.
|
|||||
| Jones v. State, No. 248, 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, November 8, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was not entitled to mandamus relief where he did not demonstrate a clear right to the performance of a duty; although defendant argued that he was deprived of the benefit of a full two-year suspended sentence as a result of the Delaware Department of Correction's failure to place him in a particular program, that argument was speculative.
|
|||||
| Mundy v. Devon, No. 174, 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, November 8, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Symphorien v. Symphorien, No. 267, 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, November 8, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Weaver v. State, No. 422, 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, November 8, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because nothing in the record substantiated defendant's claim that his failure to file a timely notice of appeal under Del. Sup. Ct. R. 6 was attributable to court-related personnel, it was dismissed pursuant to Del. Sup. Ct. R. 29(b).
|
|||||
| Williams v. State, No. 330, 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, November 8, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
