LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Delaware - July 17, 2006

  
In re Petition of DeWitt, No. 332, 2006, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, July 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Because an inmate failed to demonstrate an arbitrary failure or refusal to act on his postconviction motion by the Superior Court, his petition for mandamus relief, filed under Del. Const. art. IV, 11(6) and Del. Sup. Ct. R. 43, seeking his immediate release or an appearance before the President Judge, was dismissed.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Am. Legacy Found., No. 579, 2005, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, July 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: In a contract dispute arising out of a settlement agreement between tobacco companies and state attorneys general, a tobacco company's appeal was without merit because a non-profit corporation's campaign's advertisements seeking to reduce tobacco use among young people did not satisfy the plain meaning of "vilification" or "personal attacks."

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Marshall v. Nickerson, No. 606, 2005, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, July 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Family court's order modifying a mother's visitation schedule was affirmed because there was ample record support for the decision. Further, to the extent that there was any possible ambiguity in the family court's order, the family court's response to the mother's motion for re-argument removed it.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Thompson v. State, No. 551, 2005, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, July 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's sentence of one year at Level V was affirmed because the sentence was within the statutory limit for a class F felony - three years in prison. Moreover, the trial court explained its reasons for the sentence.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Waters v. Div. of Family Servs., No. 498, 2005, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, July 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: A father's right to due process was violated by family services agency and family court when his parental rights were terminated under Del. Code Ann. tit. 13, § 1103. He did not abandon his child, and despite Del. Code Ann. tit. 29, § 9003(13), agency made no reasonable effort to unite them but prevented any relationship by refusing him visitation.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Wisher v. State, No. 584, 2005, SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, July 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's convictions were affirmed because inconsistencies in an accomplice's testimony did not create an irreconcilable conflict concerning defendant's knowledge and participation in a drug deal. Further, the trial court did not commit plain error by failing to instruct the jury about the inherent limitations in accomplice testimony.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.