 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| LaPoint v. Amerisourcebergen Corp., Civil Action No. 327-N,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, July 18, 2006, Decided , July 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A purchasing corporation's motion for a protective order to preclude former shareholders of a sold corporation from conducting ex parte interviews of several managerial employees was denied where only key non-privileged facts were sought; such did not violate Del. Law. R. Prof. Conduct 4.2.
|
|||||
| Patterson v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., C.A. No. 04C-10-079 MMJ,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, July 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where there was testimony that the surgery was not performed within the two-year window provided by Del. Code Ann. tit. 21, § 2118(a)(2)(h) because the insurer's denial of coverage rendered the surgery impossible or impractical until the window had closed, the insurer was not entitled to summary judgment in the no-fault benefits case.
|
|||||
| State v. Banther, ID. No. 9705000270,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, July 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where murder conviction was reversed and where reviewing court, on grounds of collateral estoppel, curtailed State's ability, upon retrial, to show that defendant and codefendant worked together to kill victim or that defendant aided in planning murder, dismissal was not warranted. Defendant did not show that State's proposed theory was untenable.
|
|||||
| Wilhelm v. Ryan, No. 175, 2005,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, July 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of claimant's motion in limine to exclude alleged tortfeasor's testimony about her criminal conviction and remorse involving auto accident stemming from her operation of vehicle under the influence of alcohol was not error; alleged tortfeasor's conviction and remorse were relevant to issue of punitive damages to be awarded.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
