 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bell Sports, Inc. v. Yarusso, No. 187, 1999,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, September 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because appellee had demonstrated that the experts had sufficient knowledge to be admitted as experts, the admission of their testimony was not an abuse of discretion by the trial court.
|
|||||
| Caravetta v. McKesson HBOC, CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 00C-04-214-WTQ,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, September 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Stay was granted in Delaware class action alleging securities violations following stock-for-stock mergers; lead plaintiff in California action could have presented plaintiffs' claims, which arose out of same factual background.
|
|||||
| McGinnis-Townsend v. Dep't of Servs. for Children, No. 584, 1999,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, September 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Nastatos v. Delmarva Power & Light Co., Civil Action No. 2000-03-395,
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, September 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Reargument motion pursuant to Delaware civil procedure rules required both timely service and filing. Reargument motion was found to be untimely where opposing counsel was not properly served.
|
|||||
| Webb v. Pfusch, No. 483, 1999,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, September 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Harvey v. Super Fresh Food Mkts., C.A. No. 95C-08-243-JEB,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, September 8, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Customer was not entitled to entry of judgment regarding liability or a new trial regarding damages in his cause of action for negligence against store, where customer's injury arose out of a robbery and shooting.
|
|||||
| Jachimek v. Wilmington Trust Co., No. 129, 2000,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, September 8, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Plouffe v. Hastings, C.M. No. 3069, G-198,
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, September 8, 2000, Date Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: By seeking to postpone partition sale of family farm, respondents, who owned interest in the farm along with petitioners, sought not to have farm sold to highest bidder, but to buy farm at discount. Request to delay sale denied.
|
|||||
| Power of Atty. & Representation in Court, LEGAL MEMORANDUM 00-250,
FAMILY COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, September 8, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Non-lawyers could not represent principals in court or sign court papers on behalf of principals. Court clerk could not accept complaint signed by non-lawyer with power of attorney.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
