|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Delaware - September 3 - September 4, 2008
|
| |
In re Sample, Nos. 340, 2008, 356, 2008 CONSOLIDATED n11 Because these petitions present common questions of fact and law, we hereby consolidate them sua sponte.,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, September 3, 2008, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because the Attorney General's Office obtained the documents requested by an inmate and provided him with copies of them, the inmate failed to invoke the original jurisdiction of the state supreme court; accordingly, his petition for a writ of mandamus under Del. Const. art. IV, ? 11(6), Del. Sup. Ct. R. 43 was dismissed as moot.
|
|
| |
Prospero v. State, No. 191, 2008,
SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE, September 3, 2008, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because defendant did not raise any issues for consideration on appeal and because his appeal was found to be wholly without merit and devoid of any arguably appealable issues, pursuant to Del. Sup. Ct. R. 26(c), the State's motion to affirm was granted, the judgment was affirmed, and counsel's motion to withdraw was moot.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback