 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Hurley v. Justice of the Peace, C.A. No. 05M-01-010(JTV),
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, KENT, November 29, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Statement in a final order that "judgment is entered" was sufficient notice under Del. J.P. Ct. Civ. R. 58 to the litigants that judgment was entered on the date stated in the order, or the date of the order. Justice's order was sufficient where order was docketed, and copy of the order was mailed to both parties with notice of appeal rights.
|
|||||
| Pettit v. Country Life Homes, C.A. No. 03C-03-026-RFS,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, November 29, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Superior court denied an employee's motion to amend his negligence complaint nine months after the filing deadline passed, where such would be prejudicial, and it appeared that such was filed in an attempt to avoid a summary judgment motion filed against him. Further, a motion to reargue, which rehashed arguments already decided, was denied.
|
|||||
| State ex rel. Brady v. Wellington Homes, Inc., C.A. No. 99C-09-168 -- JTV,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE, November 29, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A corporation was entitled to judgment as a matter of law in an action alleging violations of the Delaware Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices Acts as the new homes at issue were built by other corporate defendants and insufficient evidence was presented to support a theory that the corporation was responsible for acts of other defendants.
|
|||||
| State v. Franklin, Def. ID # 0304010407,
SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE, SUSSEX, November 29, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under Del. Judges' Code Jud. Conduct Canon 3C(1), postconviction relief court denied defendant's motion to recuse itself. In trials of defendant over which court presided, it did not have opinions about him other than those related to the trials and it found that it could objectively consider his pending motions free of personal bias or prejudice.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
