 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Doctors Council of the Dist. of Columbia Gen. Hosp. v. D.C. Pub. Emple. Rels. Bd., No. 02-CV-1255,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, January 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a pay dispute, the Public Employee Relations Board erred in giving priority to former D.C. Code § 32-262.8(h), pertaining to personnel administration, over former D.C. Code § 1-618.4(a)(3) and (5), regarding unfair labor practices. The acts could be construed together and reconciled in a manner that achieved the legislative intent behind both.
|
|||||
| Dumas v. Woods, No. 05-FM-1270,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, January 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a mother's appeal from an order granting legal and physical custody of her son solely to the child's father, the requirements of D.C. Code § 16-914 had not been met, and the appeals court was left without a basis for meaningful appellate review of the custody order. The factors of § 16-914(a)(3) had not been addressed.
|
|||||
| In re Steele, No. 04-BG-429,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, January 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was publicly censured as reciprocal discipline for public reprimand received in Florida; D.C. Bar R. XI, § 11(c) exceptions to such discipline did not apply as attorney voluntarily chose not to attend final hearing in Florida, and ample evidence supported ruling that threatening letter sent to client's dentist violated Florida bar rules.
|
|||||
| In re Brown, Guardianship No. 39-03,
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, PROBATE DIVISION, January 18, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Probate court determined that it had authority to approve or disapprove a trustee's fees for a special needs trust because D.C. Code § 19-1307.08 gave the court the authority to approve or disapprove fees. The court then ruled that a disallowance of the maximum requested fees, and a reduction of the fees which were reasonable was warranted.
|
|||||
| In re Robinson, No. 04-BG-1472,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, January 18, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A disbarred attorney finally had met his heavy burden of proof for reinstatement under D.C. Bar R. XI, § 16(d)(1), (2). Both the Board on Professional Responsibility and Bar Counsel emphasized that he had shown steady improvement in dealing with his finances, and a corresponding improvement in his candor.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
