 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Barron v. United States, No. 00-CF-366,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, March 20, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in allowing jury to view defendant's car after case was submitted to jury without giving parties opportunity to argue significance of evidence. Error was not harmless, as jury resolved deadlock quickly after viewing car.
|
|||||
| Gallothom, Inc. v. D.C. Alcoholic Bev. Control Bd., No. 00-AA-373,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, March 20, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A restaurant owner's application for renewal of its liquor license was properly denied where a new factual transaction was evaluated; the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel did not apply to bar that review.
|
|||||
| Hardi v. Mezzanotte, No. 99-CV-1386, No. 99-CV-1540,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, March 20, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Unpaid and written-off medical expenses could be recovered as compensatory damages in a medical malpractice action, as the written-off expenses were a benefit from a collateral source that could not be used to reduce the amount of the damages owed.
|
|||||
| United States v. Roberts, Criminal Case No. F-771-01, Criminal Case No. F-3986-00,
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, CRIMINAL DIVISION, March 25, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendants' motions to exclude DNA evidence in their trials was denied because the analytical methods used by the FBI were generally accepted in the scientific community under the Frye standard, and there was no evidence that the FBI did not follow analytical protocols. Probability estimates were acceptable and admissible.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
